Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Compared with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy with Surgery in Locally Advanced Resectable Esophageal Cancer / 대한소화기학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study was designed to compare the survival rates between patients with localized esophgeal cancer who were treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy without surgery and patients who were treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy including surgery. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients from January 1997 to December 2005 with locally advaned resectable esophageal cancer were selected and retrospectively analyzed. Survival period was defined as the time to death from the date of diagnosis or mid-monitor period of December 2005. Sixty-one patients were treated with chemoradiation therapy alone while twenty-seven patients were treated with chemoradiation therapy in addition to surgery as for curative intention. As for radiation therapy, 5,000-5,500 cGY was used. 5-Fluouracil and cisplatin were used for chemotherapy. The primary end point was overall survival time. The secondary end point was overall progression free survival time. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in tissue type, location and clinical staging, but the median age was significantly younger in the group treated with surgery (63.4 years) than the group treated without surgery (68.8 years). Median period analyzed was 17.3 months. Five year survival rate for the group with chemoradiation alone was 7.4% and 4% for the group with surgery. The median survival rate was 11+/-3 months for the group with chemoradiation alone and 10+/-6 months for the group with surgery, in which there was no statistical difference (p=0.697). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant increase in survival rate in patients who were treated by chemoradiation with surgery compared with chemoradiation alone. Further analysis in terms of prospective study is needed.

A Case of Pseudomembranous Colitis Associated with Rifampicin Therapy in a Patient with Rectal Cancer and Gastrointestinal Tuberculosis / 대한소화기학회지

Pseudomembranous colitis (PMC) is known to be associated with the administration of antibiotics which alter normal gastrointestinal flora and allow overgrowth of Clostridium difficile. Most cases of rifampicin-induced PMC are seen in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis, but not with gastrointestinal tuberculosis. We report a case of PMC associated with rifampicin therapy in a patient with gastrointestinal tuberculosis. A 65-year-old female patient with rectal cancer and gastrointestinal tuberculosis was admitted due to abdominal pain and diarrhea. She was treated with anti-tuberculosis agents containing rifampicin. On colonoscopic examination, mucoid exudates and yellowish plaque lesions were observed. Anti-tuberculosis agents were stopped, and the patient was treated with metronidazole. Symptoms were relieved and did not recur when all the anti-tuberculosis agents except rifampicin were started again. When a patient complains of abdominal pain or diarrhea while taking rifampicin, the physician should consider the possibility of rifampicin-associated PMC.

Comparison Study between Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography Using Real-Time Three Dimensional and Two Dimensional Echocardiography for Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease : Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography Using Real-Time Three Dimensional Echocardiogr

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) with 2D echocardiography (2DE) is one of the time-consuming procedures in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). Moreover, the accuracy of DSE with 2DE depends on the operator's skill or bias during the image acquisition. This study was conducted to determine the feasibility and accuracy of DSE with real-time 3D echocardiography (RT3DE) for the diagnosis of CAD. SUBJECT AND METHODS: 62 patients (RT3DE: 36, 2DE: 26), suspected of angina pectoris and post-revascularization ischemia, underwent DSE and coronary angiography (CAG). Image acquisition was performed at the baseline, and at 4 times during the dobutamine infusion and recovery stages. The procedure time (from the baseline to the end of the peak dose stage) was recorded. Off-line analyses of the volumetric images acquired with RT3DE were performed using 3D computer software (TomTec, Co.). Digitized quad-screen images acquired with 2DE were analyzed using the 2DE review system (ProSolv 4.0). >50% luminal diameter stenosis of any coronary artery on CAG was defined as significant coronary artery stenosis. RESULTS: The procedure time of DSE with RT3DE was significantly shorter than that of DSE with 2DE (25+/-4 vs. 37+/-4 mins, p0.05) or specificity (p>0.05) between the two procedures. CONCLUSION: DSE with RT3DE seems to be a feasible and less time consuming diagnostic procedure, probably providing comparable sensitivity and specificity for the detection of coronary artery stenosis, than DSE with 2DE.